🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 258+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Louis Vuitton Hand Bag

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.7 out of 5(258 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$171
$285
Sale
βœ“ gratis dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Used bag Good condition still Accepting offers No tagsNo strap

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid dispatch
↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Louis Vuitton Hand Bag

Used bag
Good condition still
Accepting offers
No tags
No strap​

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 653851

Category: Vintage > Bags & Purses > Handbags

Original Price: $285 USD

Sale Price: $171 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ gratis shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.7
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2637 reviews
LN
Lauren Nelson βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous Louis Vuitton Hand Bag
From my experience, the Louis Vuitton Hand Bag fits my needs and I don’t regret it. distribution was normal.​
9 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· San Jose, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
Everything about this Louis Vuitton Hand Bag is good.
49 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez
5 months ago Β· Virginia Beach, VA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
I think the Louis Vuitton Hand Bag is fair value for money.
47 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Seattle, WA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
outstanding purchase
To be fair, the Louis Vuitton Hand Bag works as described so no complaints. Nothing fancy.
5 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Oakland, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless for my needs
The Louis Vuitton Hand Bag met my basic expectations.
6 people found this helpful