🚚 no-cost SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 384+ reviews
Tools βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Stanley torpedo level

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.4 out of 5(384 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$13
$21.67
Sale
βœ“ gratis dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Pat. 259 made in the USA around 1937-1960 Good condition level is still plumb

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
rapid dispatch

↩️
uncomplicated Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Stanley torpedo level

Pat. 259 made in the USA around 1937-1960
Good condition level is still plumb

This product is flawless for anyone looking for quality Tools products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 663469

Category: Tools > Measuring & Layout > Levels

Original Price: $21.67 USD

Sale Price: $13 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ gratis shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2014 reviews
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Columbus, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
impeccable in every way
Good choice if you are looking for a Vintage Stanley torpedo level.
24 people found this helpful
MR
Matthew Robinson βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· merely-arrived York, NY
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Fantastic product
So far, the Vintage Stanley torpedo level is practical and it meets expectations.
32 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase 
10 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
finest Vintage Stanley torpedo level ever
For the price, it works fine and it’s fine overall.
22 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Minneapolis, MN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A must-have
For the price, the Vintage Stanley torpedo level feels solid which feels reasonable. dispatch was normal.
40 people found this helpful
JB
James Brown
10 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
Honestly, it is functional to use so it’s acceptable.
14 people found this helpful